Skip to main content

HON. BORIS JOHNSON SUSPENSION OF THE UK PARLIAMENT 2019


To:     The Right Honourable President of the Supreme Court Hon. Lady Hale.
From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja
Date: September 24, 2019
RE:     THE UK PRIME MINISTER
HON. BORIS JOHNSON SUSPENSION OF THE UK PARLIAMENT 2019.
Suggestion: My Lord, let me start my paying my respects to you and through you to. You must be aware of BREXIT is a serious consequence with so many unforeseen consequences. IMHO, BREXITERS have no respect for parliamentary democracy and the rule of law because the UK Parliament can arrive at a BREXIT decision even if BREXIT has so many unforeseen consequences. If the UK MP’s respected British democracy then all the UK MP’s would have worked together with the EU counterpart to deliver an acceptable deal based on the UK-EU Referendum 2016. British people voted leave the EU but they didn’t vote for No Deal. The Present Prime Minister of the UK Mr. Boris Johnson think that he is above democracy and the rule of law and his will is more important than rest of the British. What happened to the UK Parliament is sovereign? What happened to the 450 years of evolving the UK Parliamentary democracy? Does the Revolution of 1688 and The Bloodless Revolution of 1688 is still followed instituting the UK Parliamentary supremacy and the rule of law? I am sorry to say that the UK Parliament has disregard of democracy that has set standards for very long time. The UK Parliamentary democracy where Parliament has been suspended on the advice of the Prime Minister Mr. Boris Johnson to the QUEEN and that advice is not accurate or lies then there is no political solution available. This gives the UK Prime Minister Mr. Boris Johnson has complete control over the UK political system as Mr. Boris Johnson can suspend Parliament at his will without the support of the opposition. If I am not mistaken, while Parliament is not sitting the UK Prime Minister needed to get Parliament to pass a “Bill of Attainder”. The UK Prime Minister is not a dictator. He cannot make new laws or increase taxes. He needed to get Parliament to pass “Finance Acts” each year. Yes, the UK Prime Minister has the power granted him by statute only. I don’t want to see the UK judges politicised that really attack the essence of the UK democracy. The honourable Supreme Court knew that the UK constitution relies on various checks and balances and each player realising that no one can act unilaterally and no one can act without considering the views of many other players. The checks and balance of the UK constitution depend on the various players being honest and plays by the rule of law. It is the essence of the UK democracy. I fervently hope that honourable Supreme Court has the power to scrutinise and decide on the constitutionality of the suspension of the Parliament by the UK Prime Minister. It is time to reinstate impeachment for the UK Parliamentary supremacy and the rule of law by the UK Prime Minister.
My Lord, BREXIT has set the EU and the UK against each other. BREXIT has set the British people against each other. BREXIT has set the UK politicians against each other. BREXIT has set up no democratic legitimacy in Scotland and Northern Ireland. BREXIT has set the UK so isolated. BREXIT has set the UK territorial integrity under pressure. BREXIT has set alienating the UK allies and eroding all good will. BREXIT has set the courts of the United Kingdom (English Courts, Scottish Courts and Northern Irish Courts) against each other. BREXIT has set the constituent countries of the Kingdom against each other. BREXIT has set the UK constitutional crisis. BREXIT has set the UK political crisis. BREXIT has set the UK economic crisis. BREXIT has set the UK biggest crisis in decades. BREXIT has set the Prime Minister drawn in the Queen against convention. This time is not only to the UK but to the Queen. My Lord, it is going to take very long time to regain the trust that has been lost because of BREXIT crisis. My Lord, I most humbly prayed the Honourable Supreme Court is to review the Parliament suspension against legality of statutory instrument and judge if there has been violation of parliament suspension. I say with confidence that Mr. Boris Johnson prorogued Parliament to stop scrutiny of his BREXIT strategy. Mr. Boris Johnson took drastic steps as No Deal BREXIT without a Parliamentary majority. There is no majority in the UK Parliament for No Deal BREXIT. No deal is a minority preference in the UK Parliament as well as British people. When I wrote to Hon. Theresa May government I insisted that No Deal BREXIT would result in a state of emergency. This is the greatest constitutional crisis of the UK.
My Lord, my argument is that the question of the royal prerogative permits the Queen to exercise her powers even if the advice is dishonestly given? If it is normal, Her Majesty’s Government (HMG) needs a Queen speech. If Honourable Supreme Court judgement to prorogue Parliament is a political issue not a legal issue, my argument is that the question of whether the Prime Minister’s the reasons given to the Queen for the advice is true or not must be a legal issue whatever the subject of the advice. If those reasons were false or not a legitimate reason the Honourable Supreme Court has evidence that to declare prorogation Parliament is illegal. I want to see the Honourable Supreme Court judges to defend their freedoms and institutions while pronouncing the judgement. I would like to see the honourable Supreme Court judges should stay away from the Prime Minister’s BREXIT strategy. My Lord, you are the master of the UK constitution, you must be aware that the royal power of dissolution of Parliament was abolished by the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 1911, Section 3(2). Mr. Boris Johnson use of prorogation is to close down the Parliament for six weeks and for two more weeks than usual autumn recess is an assault of parliamentary democracy. It has to prevent either Parliamentarians to bring down Mr. Boris Johnson government in a no confidence vote before BREXIT or primary legislation taking the matter form the Mr. Boris Johnson hands. In either case, Mr. Boris Johnson is abusing power of preventing an elected government from fulfilling its constitutional role about BREXIT. It is also an assault of parliamentary democracy. This type of constitutional cheating or abusing power does damage to the reputation of the UK’s constitution and Parliament.  
My Lord, you must be aware that building stable state and stable institutions takes hundreds of years but to wreck it just need few days. At present, the UK and institutions remain extremely vulnerable to demagogue take over. Mr. Boris Johnson and some BREXIT ministers have shown conflict with the Parliamentary supremacy and the rule of law. My Lord, the UK Parliament has had ample opportunity to agree on alternative BREXIT deal. I don’t know why it has failed to do so? The honourable Supreme Court judgement will take the UK constitution into preserve the UK democracy and maintain the UK’s reputation as a respected nation at world stage. My Lord, the Scot judges basically said Mr. Boris Johnson lied before Queen. If the Honourable Supreme Court finds in favour of the UK Prime Minister, will be a very conflicting political, social and more fuel for the Scottish, Northern Ireland and perhaps Wales separatists. I firmly believe that the honourable Supreme Court will be to hold the decision of Scotland Court to stand for national unity and the defense of the UK parliamentary democracy.      
Thank you very much for your kind attention My Lord.  
Respectfully yours,
Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THANK YOU NOTE TO FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA DR A S ANAND

To: The Hon’ble   Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, Former Chief Justice of   India & Empowered Committee Chairman From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 RE: Thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution Bench of Supreme Court Judges.   My lord, please accept my heartfelt thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution bench of Supreme Court Judges on behalf of myself and all of the people in Tamilnadu for saving lakhs of farmers in the southern districts of Tamilnadu and the fine report you made. I wish you continued success in what you are doing my lord. The completion of the remaining judgement on Mullaperiyar will require Dharma. Every judgement should apply Dharma. Dharma should not be destroyed in any of our judgement. My lord, As you knew that “ according to lease agreement indenture granted full right, power and liberty to the Tamilnadu to construct make...

ISRAEL-IRAN-SYRIA CONFLICTS

To: The Right Honourable Israel Prime Minister Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: May 09, 2018 RE: Israel – Iran – Syria Conflicts Suggestion The Honourable Prime Minister Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, I am writing this letter to you on Israel air strike in Syria yesterday. You are trying to do everything possible to stop Iranian bases in Syria. Do you believe that Iran is building permanent bases inside Syria or close to Israel? How much land has Iran captured or taken from Syria? My answer is none. But you are openly threatened Iran.   Let me put it very clearly to you, there are no winners with war but losers are there. I agreed that you have strongest military force on earth. You could easily arrange a favourable peace treaty with Syria and Iran but you don’t want to negotiate with the Syria and Iran. Israel could not exist as a permanent aggressor without US. It is my humble request you to negotiate peace treaty with Syria and Ir...

Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

To put things into perspective, Nagorno-Karabakh is not an independent entity but an occupied territory of the Azerbaijan Republic and is recognised by the international community and the UN. The fact that the Armenian Prime Minister's son is doing his military service in the Armenian army located in Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh and started an undeclared war against Azerbaijan, occupied Nagorno-Karabakh and 7 adjacent regions of Azerbaijan, and massacred and forcefully deported Azerbaijani aborigines was the main reason for the lack of peace in the region. The laws of armed conflict failed to protect the Nagorno-Karabakh civilian population, individual civilians, and civilian property. The laws of armed conflict failed to discriminate between those taking parts in the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh. The laws of armed conflict failed to protect the environment as war causes severe or long term damage to the environment. The fact here is that there is a number of international doc...