Skip to main content

THE IMPLICATION OF BANK OF ENGLAND FASTER INTEREST RATE INCREASES


To:     The Right Honourable Bank of England Governor Mr. Mark Carney

From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date: November 5, 2018

RE:     The implication of Bank of England faster interest rate increases.

Suggestion:
Mr. Governor let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. I just heard from Bank of England in the event of hard BREXIT, it would be less likely to continue tightening and even ease monetary policy to support UK economic growth and in the event of soft BREXIT it would be more likely to continue tightening and aggravate monetary policy to support UK economic growth that would be compatible with Bank of England alleviating in the wake of the UK BREXIT vote. In my opinion it is diametrically the wrong policy because hard BREXIT more likely to add to inflationary pressure, sterling falls and it generates economic downturn. IMHO, we should not ease monetary policy in the situation of a hard BREXIT. We can ease monetary policy in the situation of soft BREXIT but not the hard BREXIT. Hard BREXIT add to more inflationary pressure, sterling falls and it generates UK economic growth downturn. Hard BREXIT make it happen by the Hon. Theresa May government. Let Hon. Theresa May bear full responsibility. It is my humble request to the Bank of England Governor not to make any contributions to the leave vote or remain vote.  The MPC should be reminded that their legal mandate makes price stability which should be their exclusive first priority. The price stability objective should be meeting the MPC suppose to support the UK economic growth and employment. There are provisions in the Bank of England Act for the UK government to direct monetary policy in extreme economic situations. If the Bank of England eased or tightened monetary policy in response to the leave or remains vote, monetary policy may builds of moral hazard. In the event of crisis, expectations of the alleviating action become so large the Bank of England cannot meet those expectations despite allowing inflation exceed. As a result there is an acute crisis.

Hon. Governor i knew that MPC is too concerned to support the UK economic growth and the UK housing market and it is key driver for the UK’s growth. I would like to recommend MPC should be reminded that their legal mandate makes price stability which should be their exclusive first priority. Sometimes it is significantly challenged when central banks deviate from their legal mandate. The bad experience of Bank of England deviating from their legal mandate should be a lesson to learn. I trust that suggestions made therein are of helpful and relevance to the Bank of England interest rate increases. Should you have any questions regarding the content of this letter please contact me by mail?    

Thank you very much for your attention.

Respectfully yours
Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja.
Athinarayanan Twitter
Athinarayanan Advisory Authority.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act