Skip to main content

THANK YOU NOTE TO FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA DR A S ANAND


To: The Hon’ble Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, Former Chief Justice of India & Empowered Committee Chairman

From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012

RE: Thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution Bench of Supreme Court Judges. 

My lord, please accept my heartfelt thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution bench of Supreme Court Judges on behalf of myself and all of the people in Tamilnadu for saving lakhs of farmers in the southern districts of Tamilnadu and the fine report you made. I wish you continued success in what you are doing my lord. The completion of the remaining judgement on Mullaperiyar will require Dharma. Every judgement should apply Dharma. Dharma should not be destroyed in any of our judgement.

My lord, As you knew that “according to lease agreement indenture granted full right, power and liberty to the Tamilnadu to construct make and carry out on the leased land and to use exclusively when constructed, made and carried out, all such irrigation works and other works ancillary thereto to.” Thus the water and the land would belong to Tamilnadu for 999 years, and as long as the agreement period. If Kerala wants to decommission the present dam only to go out of the agreement in order to obliterate the rights of Tamilnadu accrued under the 1886 and 1970 agreements. If the present Mullaperiyar dam is decommissioned it is tantamount to losing all rights of Tamilnadu over the waters, unless and until another dam is constructed on the same site. My lord, it is true that the Government of Kerala wants to quash the rights and obligations created under the two agreements in favour of Tamilnadu. If the real concern of the Kerala government, they should only make a request to Tamilnadu to strengthen the dam. Supreme Court on Monday permitted Tamilnadu to carry out repair and maintenance works on the Mullaperiyar dam. It was a great judgement by Supreme Court.  

As I have said so earlier my lord, the proposal of the Kerala government is to construct a new dam at a level 1300 feet below the present level. It would be impossible to divert water eastward to Tamilnadu from that level. But it would be very much possible to divert water to Idukki dam. That is the master plan of Kerala government. My lord, it is true that the intention behind the new dam is not Kerala people safety. Kerala government wants to take over control of the dam indirectly by building new dam. Kerala says that they will give enough water to Tamilnadu but they are not ready to talk about control of the dam and lease agreement. Earlier, Tamilnadu government did a mistake by allowing Karnataka government to built the Kabini dam in Cauvery. Karanataka government gave assurance of water but you know the present status my lord. Yes, we do not want to repeat the same mistake again my lord.

My lord, the research planning and the sacrifices made by the Madras Chief Engineers before deciding to construct the dam, cannot be ignored or lightly taken by any one. The dam was intended to last for 1000 years and more. As you know that Kallani was built 1800 years ago across Cauvery but still it is very strong. My lord, one should not forget the fact that even if the present dam is decommissioned or destroyed, Tamilnadu government has the right to build another dam at the same site and draw the waters.    
My lord, it is most humbly prayed that on the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and Empowered Committee not to allow construct a new dam by Kerala government. If Kerala government built a new dam, lakhs of farmers in Southern States of Tamilnadu will be affected. It would be nightmare for Tamilnadu farmers. If new dam built by Government of Tamilnadu, it would be beneficial for both states. Kerala wants safety of the people and Tamilnadu wants water for farmers. My lord, I am confident that you can resolve this issue reasonable satisfaction of both sides in the forthcoming judgement.    

Once again, I thank you, the members of empowered committee and five judge constitution bench of Supreme Court judges for delivered great judgment on Mullaperiyar dam on behalf of myself and all the people in Tamilnadu

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act