Skip to main content

THE UK SECRETARY STATE FOR BUSINESS SIR VINCE CABLE

To       The Right Honorable Secretary of State for Business Vince Cable MP.      
From:  Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja
Date:  December 19, 2011
RE:      UK Manufacturing  
Suggestion: UK Corporate Tax Reform
Good Morning Minister. I read Financial Times, London, it reported that you announced £ 125 million set up to improve the global competitiveness of UK advanced manufacturing supply chains. Today companies compete on the competitiveness of their overall supply chains. The loss of major UK plants could jeopardize critical mass in the UK supply chain. It would be a good place to start but as for UK manufacturing and supply chains that are built on complex and often incoherent.
From my perspective UK manufacturing policy is still ineffective. In an effort to revive the manufacturing sector, first, focus on raising the productivity because a successful and dynamic economy must be productive. I suggest UK government should work closely with leading multinationals to improve productivity and remove barriers to growth for new entrants such as land use restrictions and regulatory burdens to make the UK the most attractive place for multinationals.
Second is tax reform because manufacturing competitiveness remains at the heart of corporate tax reform. UK has high value added manufacturers with high wage, more tax on corporate, skilled labour force working with an advanced level of technological infrastructure to produce goods along the higher end of the value goods made multinationals have relocated their activities abroad. For instance, Shire, WPP, Wolseley. Indeed, this has reduced the UK’s tax base. Moreover these companies action also threaten the domestic employment. UK government needs to address these larger issues. I therefore recommend UK government should work closely with multinational businesses to understand what is required to bring the companies back to the UK to make UK the most attractive location for multinationals. In my view, corporate tax should be in the range between 20-22%. This would make UK attractive to companies with low leverage and also improve financial stability. Besides we need to revise R & D tax credit to encourage multinational investments. R & D Tax credit should be based on incremental investment over a baseline rather than investment as in the UK. Moreover, the government should stimulate SME which are among the most innovative or research orientated businesses by lowering their tax thresholds and giving some special capital allowances. The idea is to create an environment where it makes sense for SME to reinvest their profits in UK in new plants and new equipments to turn promising SME into large successful ones.
Third, Government should not engage in selective industrial policy. For instance, UK Government has relatively high level of Defense spending. This would only make Britain’s industrial policy incoherent and the necessary rival of its manufacturing sector unlikely. 
Let me conclude it Mr. Minister, there are many drivers owed to government policy help to shape the competitiveness of UK manufacturing such as talent – Science & Technology, Innovation, cost of labor and materials, supplier network, energy cost, legal and regulatory system, trade policy and financial but corporate tax reform remain the heart of UK manufacturing competitiveness but lowering corporation tax to reverse the recent decline in UK manufacturing competitiveness will attract new multinationals and reduce the outflow of existing companies located in the UK. The loss of further large firms would be extremely costly for the UK. This would lower income directly and reduce the government tax income. In fact effective tax aligned supply chain can help companies to restructure or all stages of their supply chain processes from sourcing and manufacturing to distribution and sales processes. I therefore recommend corporate tax reform to make UK the most attractive location for multinationals.
I hope that my suggestion will play a key role to make UK the most attractive location for multinationals in the future.
I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

To put things into perspective, Nagorno-Karabakh is not an independent entity but an occupied territory of the Azerbaijan Republic and is recognised by the international community and the UN. The fact that the Armenian Prime Minister's son is doing his military service in the Armenian army located in Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh and started an undeclared war against Azerbaijan, occupied Nagorno-Karabakh and 7 adjacent regions of Azerbaijan, and massacred and forcefully deported Azerbaijani aborigines was the main reason for the lack of peace in the region. The laws of armed conflict failed to protect the Nagorno-Karabakh civilian population, individual civilians, and civilian property. The laws of armed conflict failed to discriminate between those taking parts in the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh. The laws of armed conflict failed to protect the environment as war causes severe or long term damage to the environment. The fact here is that there is a number of international doc...

SUGGESTION TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, GERMANY

SUGGESTION TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, GERMANY  To:               The Right Honorable Federal Constitutional Court Vice President  From:           Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date:            05.10.2011 RE:               Issuance of Eurobond   Suggestion:    Approval of Issuing Eurobond Good Morning Prof. Dr. Kirchhof. I am writing to express that Federal constitutional court explicitly rules out Eurobonds a few weeks ago. In addition you had warned, Ms. Angela Merkel, a Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, never again to propose Eurobond. This is certainly not good news for me as well as Europe. German brothers and sisters in the Euroland must help in this difficult moment with iss...

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA To: The Right Honorable Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: 30.09.2011 RE: Japan Energy Policy Suggestion: Changing Industrial Policy Good Morning Prime Minister. BBC World broadcasted your speech regarding alternate energy sources. I agree with your approach to reduce nuclear power in the medium term because having the nuclear reactors in an earthquake prone zone is not safe for the environment or the communities that live near them. Japan is struck in a difficult situation concerning energy. If you want to eventually move away from the nuclear energy, you’ll have to invest more alternative energy sources. If you can’t invest, then it may have to say with a nuclear power for a while. You need make the right decision because source of energy is dwindling. You have one more option which is Japanese people depend on nuclear power with only 1% but 9% including hydroe...