Skip to main content

THE UK SECRETARY STATE FOR BUSINESS SIR VINCE CABLE

To       The Right Honorable Secretary of State for Business Vince Cable MP.      
From:  Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja
Date:  December 19, 2011
RE:      UK Manufacturing  
Suggestion: UK Corporate Tax Reform
Good Morning Minister. I read Financial Times, London, it reported that you announced £ 125 million set up to improve the global competitiveness of UK advanced manufacturing supply chains. Today companies compete on the competitiveness of their overall supply chains. The loss of major UK plants could jeopardize critical mass in the UK supply chain. It would be a good place to start but as for UK manufacturing and supply chains that are built on complex and often incoherent.
From my perspective UK manufacturing policy is still ineffective. In an effort to revive the manufacturing sector, first, focus on raising the productivity because a successful and dynamic economy must be productive. I suggest UK government should work closely with leading multinationals to improve productivity and remove barriers to growth for new entrants such as land use restrictions and regulatory burdens to make the UK the most attractive place for multinationals.
Second is tax reform because manufacturing competitiveness remains at the heart of corporate tax reform. UK has high value added manufacturers with high wage, more tax on corporate, skilled labour force working with an advanced level of technological infrastructure to produce goods along the higher end of the value goods made multinationals have relocated their activities abroad. For instance, Shire, WPP, Wolseley. Indeed, this has reduced the UK’s tax base. Moreover these companies action also threaten the domestic employment. UK government needs to address these larger issues. I therefore recommend UK government should work closely with multinational businesses to understand what is required to bring the companies back to the UK to make UK the most attractive location for multinationals. In my view, corporate tax should be in the range between 20-22%. This would make UK attractive to companies with low leverage and also improve financial stability. Besides we need to revise R & D tax credit to encourage multinational investments. R & D Tax credit should be based on incremental investment over a baseline rather than investment as in the UK. Moreover, the government should stimulate SME which are among the most innovative or research orientated businesses by lowering their tax thresholds and giving some special capital allowances. The idea is to create an environment where it makes sense for SME to reinvest their profits in UK in new plants and new equipments to turn promising SME into large successful ones.
Third, Government should not engage in selective industrial policy. For instance, UK Government has relatively high level of Defense spending. This would only make Britain’s industrial policy incoherent and the necessary rival of its manufacturing sector unlikely. 
Let me conclude it Mr. Minister, there are many drivers owed to government policy help to shape the competitiveness of UK manufacturing such as talent – Science & Technology, Innovation, cost of labor and materials, supplier network, energy cost, legal and regulatory system, trade policy and financial but corporate tax reform remain the heart of UK manufacturing competitiveness but lowering corporation tax to reverse the recent decline in UK manufacturing competitiveness will attract new multinationals and reduce the outflow of existing companies located in the UK. The loss of further large firms would be extremely costly for the UK. This would lower income directly and reduce the government tax income. In fact effective tax aligned supply chain can help companies to restructure or all stages of their supply chain processes from sourcing and manufacturing to distribution and sales processes. I therefore recommend corporate tax reform to make UK the most attractive location for multinationals.
I hope that my suggestion will play a key role to make UK the most attractive location for multinationals in the future.
I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act