Skip to main content

MULLAPERIYAR DAM ISSUE - DR JUSTICE A S ANAND FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

                                          Mullaperiyar Dam Issue

To: The Hon’ble Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, Former Chief Justice of India

From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date: Thursday, December 22, 2011

RE: Mullaperiyar dam Issue

Suggestion:   

Good Morning Chief Justice. I, Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja, permanent residing at SAN Nivas, Old No. 28k, New No. 13, Bampalamman Kovil Street, Muhavoor Post, Rajapalayam Taluka, Virdhunagar District, Tamilnadu – 626 111. Today, I would like to take this opportunity to bring to your notice which should be based on reason than on extraneous factors. First, Government of Kerala claim that 22 tremors in last four months. As per the Indian Meteorological Department Data, there have been only four tremors in Idukki district that far away from the Mullaperiyar dam site. Second, the present Mullaperiyar dam is at 2800 mts above sea level and the proposed dam will be at 1800 mts (approximately) sea level that means it will be 366 m below the centre line of existing Dam.  Practically Tamilnadu won’t get water even if the Government of Kerala ready to give water to Tamilnadu state because the new Dam that Government of Kerala is proposing is at an altitude 50 feet lesser than the current dam. The water will come to Tamilnadu only if it is more than 100 feet. When new dam is constructed with 150 feet height, then also it will be 50 feet lesser than the current level. As a result Tamilnadu won’t get water. Kerala government does the wrong propaganda trying to put Tamilnadu state in trouble. Instead they have Idukki Dam 50 kms away from Mullaperiyar Dam which has holding the capacity of 7 times of Mullaperiyar Dam. Kerala government has plan to using the same water from Mullaperiyar to produce power. They are not getting enough water for generating power from Idukki Dam. That is the real fact. Third, “The Hindu” Kochi Edition on Sunday December 11, 2011 reported that  a tremor of intensity two in the Richter Scale in some parts of Idukki district, 35 km away from the Mullaperiyar dam, 11.6 km away from Idukki dam and 5.4 km away from Kulamavu dams. Can you ask the Government of Kerala to remove Idukki Dam too? Why the Government of Kerala is not talking about reservoir induced seismicity caused by Idukki Dam? Why the Government of Kerala never talked about constructing a new Dam in the existing Dam? Why do they want to keep the height of the new Dam lower than the existing Dam? Keralities are famous for orchestrating to make people believe the wrong things like they are doing for “Makara Jyothi”. (Sabarimala’s Makara Jyoti is man-made. Keralities are very expert in it)

The Hon’ble Jutice, it is most humbly prayed that on the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, you are looking into all aspects of safety of the dam. Kerala’s apprehension about the safety of the dam and Tamilnadu’s concern has been a lifeline for lakhs of people in the Southern districts of Tamilnadu. It is my belief that dam is not weak. If the dam is really weak, the best solution is to construct a new, strong and modern dam on the exact site of the present dam by Government of Tamilnadu and to raise the water to 142 feet as suggested by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. I am confident that you can resolve this issue reasonable satisfaction of both sides.   

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r
Post a Comment
Read more

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t
Post a Comment
Read more

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act
Post a Comment
Read more