Skip to main content

MULLAPERIYAR DAM ISSUE - A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS



Mullaperiyar Dam Issue - A Comprehensive Analysis 


To: The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Tamilnadu Ms. J. Jayalalitha

From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja 

Date: December 3, 2011

RE: Mullaperiyar Dam concerned with safety

Suggestion: Never allow the storage level to the 120 feet from the current 136 feet at the request of the Kerala government. 

Good Morning Chief Minister. I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja, SAN Nivas, Old No. 28K, New No. 13, Bampalamman Kovil Street, Muhavoor Post, Rajapalayam Taluka, Virudhunagar District, Tamilnadu – 626 111.  Ms. Chief Minister, I am writing to you after reading the report of the empowered Committee headed by former Chief Justice of India A.S. Anand and the Supreme Court Judgement headed by Y.K.Sabharwal (CJ), C.K. Thakker and P.K. Balasubramanyan (JJ) dated on February 27, 2006. After through study and considering all aspects I felt that there had been no adverse remarks of Mullaperiyar Dam as well as the environment. The apprehension voiced by the Government of Kerala and the peoples of Kerala was totally baseless and incorrect and based on mere figment of imagination. It is true that the Kerala Chief Minister Mr. Oommen Chandy creating panic among the people to gain his political mileage. Mullaperiyar Dam built by British India Government particularly for Government of Tamilnadu under British rule. In the past, the reservoir was filled up to full level of 152 ft as per the agreement between Secretary of State for India (now Tamilnadu) and the Maharaja of Travancore. Then Tamilnadu government lowered the storage level to 142 feet from 152 feet and again lowered to storage level to the current 136 feet from 142 feet at the request of the Kerala government to carry out safety repairs. It is fine. 

In 2006, the Supreme Court of India by its decision by a single bench allowed for the storage level to be raised to 142 feet. But the Kerala government promulgated a new "Dam Safety Act" against increasing the storage level of the Dam. I was wondering that why Tamilnadu government implement of the Supreme Court directive on the matter by raising the storage level to 142 feet. Why should we abide the law of Kerala government when the Supreme Court given clean chit to raise the storage level to 142 feet as an interim measure and the water level could be allowed to be restored at 152 feet. From my perspective, we should implement of the Supreme Court directive on the matter by raising the storage level to 142 feet. If something happens to the Dam, we will take the necessary steps to ensure that Dam remain safe and the cost implicate to keep the Dam safe should be subtracted from the annual payment, a sum specified in the agreement to the State of Kerala. This step was required to be taken immediately and both states of Tamilnadu and Kerala ought to co-operate. On taking those steps, water would be allowed to fill up to 142 feet. 

Thank you very much for letting me states my opinion.I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government lead...
Post a Comment
Read more

YEMEN CIVIL WAR

To:     The Right Honourable French President Hon. Emmanuel Macron From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: December 22, 2018 RE:      Yemen Civil War Suggestion: Hon. President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. We have seen Yemen civil war countless times. If I am not wrong, there have been 8 wars or insurgencies killing up to 180,000 Yemenis since 1934. There have been additional 50,000 are believed to be died by starvation and 2250 are believed to be died by Cholera since Saudi Arabia intervened in 2015. The Saudi Arabia-led intervention in 2015 has been criminal and brainless decision which is based on an erroneous evaluation of the traits of the Yemen civil war. The Yemen civil war draws its reason from decades of marginalisation on the Arab tribe of the Huthis by an autocratic rules sponsored by the KSA. Yemenis struggle is being led for more justice and a fairer distribution of national wealth f...
Post a Comment
Read more

THANK YOU NOTE TO FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA DR A S ANAND

To: The Hon’ble   Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, Former Chief Justice of   India & Empowered Committee Chairman From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 RE: Thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution Bench of Supreme Court Judges.   My lord, please accept my heartfelt thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution bench of Supreme Court Judges on behalf of myself and all of the people in Tamilnadu for saving lakhs of farmers in the southern districts of Tamilnadu and the fine report you made. I wish you continued success in what you are doing my lord. The completion of the remaining judgement on Mullaperiyar will require Dharma. Every judgement should apply Dharma. Dharma should not be destroyed in any of our judgement. My lord, As you knew that “ according to lease agreement indenture granted full right, power and liberty to the Tamilnadu to construct make...
Post a Comment
Read more