Skip to main content

MULLAPERIYAR DAM ISSUE - AN IMPECCABLE ANALYSIS


Mullaperiyar Dam Issue – An Impeccable Analysis

         To: The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Tamilnadu Dr. J. Jayalalitha

         From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date: December 10, 2011

RE: Mullaperiyar Issue

Suggestion: WE SHOULD NOT ACCEPT KERALA GOVERNMENT WRONG PROPAGANDA.  

Good Morning Ms. Chief Minister. Again I am writing to you after the appropriate analysis of the facts of Mullaperiyar Dam. The present Dam is at 2800 mts above sea level and the proposed Dam will be at 1800 mts sea level that means it will be 366 m below the centre line of existing Dam.  Practically we won’t get water even if the Kerala government ready to give water to our state because the new Dam that Government of Kerala is proposing is at an altitude 50 feet lesser than the current Dam. The water will come to Tamilnadu only if it is more than 100 feet. When new Dam is constructed with 150 feet height, then also it will be 50 feet lesser than the current level. As a result we won’t get water. In addition, they are trying to put full power on new dam. Kerala government does the wrong propaganda trying to put our state in trouble. Instead they have Idukki Dam 50 kms away from Mullaperiyar Dam which has holding the capacity of 7 times of Mullaperiyar Dam. Kerala government has plan to using the same water from Mullaperiyar to produce power. They are not getting enough water for generating power from Idukki Dam. That is the real fact. If I am not mistaken, what is the capacity of the Mullaperiyar Dam, it is 15 tmc. What is the capacity of the Idukki Dam, it is 70 tmc. If 40 lakhs people will die with 15 tmc dam, then how many will die in 70 tmc Dam? Can you ask them to remove Idukki Dam too?  Because mild damaging earthquake of magnitude 4.5 and intensity VI on the MM scale occurred on June 7, 1988 20 km east of the Idukki reservoir. Why the Government of Kerala is not talking about reservoir induced seismicity caused by Idukki Dam? Why the Government of Kerala never talked about constructing a new Dam in the existing Dam? Why do they want to keep the height of the new Dam lower than the existing Dam? If new Dam is needed then why Supreme Court suggests that we the people of Tamilnadu ready to build new Dam in the same ground with our money. The Government of Kerala needs not to spend their money at all. 

Let me conclude it Ms. Chief Minister, from my perspective, none of the Government of Kerala claims are true or based on evidence. Today I realize that they all ill mind set. Dam is not weak. If the Dam is really weak, the best solution is to construct a new, strong and modern Dam on the exact site of the present Dam and to raise the water to 142 feet as suggested by the Supreme Court of India. I am confident that you will take decisive decision on Mullaperiyar issue to save our state economy and people. 

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUGGESTION TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR SIR MERVYN KING

SUGGESTION TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR SIR MERVYN KING To:               The Right Honorable Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King   From:           Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date:            October 17, 2011 RE:               QE Suggestion:    Identify and correct the fundamental factors that are behind low economic growth.  Good Morning Sir. The Bank of England has decided to undertake more QE. I agreed that during the financial crisis of 2007-2008 monetary policy was effective in re-establishing liquidity in the main developed economies especially US, UK and Europe. But current economic conditions in developed economies reveal problems whose solutions are far beyond the scope of monetary an...

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA To: The Right Honorable Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: 30.09.2011 RE: Japan Energy Policy Suggestion: Changing Industrial Policy Good Morning Prime Minister. BBC World broadcasted your speech regarding alternate energy sources. I agree with your approach to reduce nuclear power in the medium term because having the nuclear reactors in an earthquake prone zone is not safe for the environment or the communities that live near them. Japan is struck in a difficult situation concerning energy. If you want to eventually move away from the nuclear energy, you’ll have to invest more alternative energy sources. If you can’t invest, then it may have to say with a nuclear power for a while. You need make the right decision because source of energy is dwindling. You have one more option which is Japanese people depend on nuclear power with only 1% but 9% including hydroe...

SUGGESTION TO THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

SUGGESTION TO THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA To:               The Right Honorable American President Barack Obama From:             Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja RE:               US Economy Suggestions: Good Morning President. Yesterday I just tuned into BBC World, they were talking about same story of American economy. Let me be very clear, I am really disappointed that you promise to fix the problems but you are eventually failed to fix the problems. You have done everything wrong and made everything worse 9.1% unemployment, trillions upon trillions in corrupt spending like record number of people on food stamps and record unemployment payouts, finally you added trillions with healthcare industry giveaway which does nothing to tackle the 50% of health spending that is wasted. ...