Skip to main content

SPANISH BANKING CRISES 2012 -


To: The Right Hon’ble Banco de España Governor Miguel Fernández Ordóñez

From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja 

Date: May 30, 2012

RE: Spain Banking Crises 

Suggestion: Good Morning Mr. Governor. Spanish banking system continue to suffer from the sovereign debt crises. The job is an onerous but it is not impossible. Spain government must act in recital with regulators and central banks to minimize the risk of further shocks of financial systems so that funding markets stablise, equity and credit markets return to health. In Spain, business demand for credit has fallen amid slow growth. The supply of credit has not been severely constrained. The first step should be separate the banks to derisk and deleverage towards creating sound business models for the future. The second step should be banks should not reduce lending in the face of funding constraints. It would be significantly damage Spain’s ability to escape severe recession.

Every country was enacting different model in order to provide effective relief for its private and state owned banks but most of the models are ineffectual. For instance, UK applied State Guarantee Scheme. UK banks are still holding a significant share of risk because the bank business model is not sound. This model only limited support for funding and liquidity. Ireland applied for Bank Asset Purchase programme. Its size is very large compare to Ireland economic resources which is small. It is ver4y costly model. Germany applied both SPV and holding structure model. It is my judgment that holding structure model was for more favourable for state owned banks than SPV model which seems to meet the needs of the  disposing of private banks toxic assets despite have solid business model. The holding structure model offers investors clearness about the remaining part of the core bank and support the banking restructure. This will allow the separation of assets from toxic. The legal and regulatory framework should be put in place to separate clear assets from toxic assets. Holding structure model doesn’t need any judiciary capital requirements, mark to market valuation and consolidation with the core bank.
I recently checked Spanish property websites, there are millions empty houses in Spain. Most of them either Bank owned or owned by developers who can’t pay back the money the banks lent them. That is massive impairment to Spanish banking balance sheets. Recently Spain Prime Minister announced that injecting the government debt bond into Bankia’s account. The Bank could then turn to the ECB and use those bonds as collateral to receive cash for the recapitalisation. This technique will prove to international investors that the Spain is having difficulties raising money on the international debt markets and make them even more reluctant to buy Spanish debt. 

I would like to recommend Spanish government would apply holding structure model in which Spanish banks can park their total toxic or also non-strategic assets outside the IFRS and banking regulation. No losses are covered by the government and the owners of the banks are directly liable future losses and not the core bank.    

I firmly believe in EU federalism. EU project don’t default. EU intends to keep it that way. Eurobonds certainly help. It can be introduced for the refinancing of any debt a country in the eurozone has over the 60 percent of GDP limit.   
  
Thank you very much for letting me states my opinion Mr. Governor.     

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you Mr. Governor. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t

AN AMBITIOUS SUMMIT TOWARDS WORLD’S LARGEST FREE-TRADE DEAL WITH EU

Hon. American President Mr. Barack Obama, Mr. President, it is a great pleasure writing to you again on transatlantic relationship for European Union and the United States of America. America is Europe’s closest partner in Transatlantic Trade and Investment. It would be the most significant bilateral FTA. It does matter because it’s covering approximately 50 percent of global output, 30 percent of world merchandise trade and 20 percent of global FDI. Thus, both US and EU gains for fiscal consolidation and high employment as no additional spending or borrowing will be needed to achieve fiscal consolidation and high employment of the US and the EU. Indeed, cost reductions will benefit businesses and generate growth and employment in the US and the EU but reducing barriers to business would accord greatest economic benefits than tariffs as tariffs between the EU and US are already low. I hope that this press conference to commit to remove all duties on transatlantic trade and e