Skip to main content

LEGAL SYSTEM AND PEACEFUL ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE PEERMEDU AND DEVIKULAM

Peermedu and Devikulam Taluks – An Impeccable Analysis
          To: The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Tamilnadu Dr. J. Jayalalitha
          From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja
Date: January 20, 2012
RE: Devikulam and Peermedu Taluks
Suggestion: Legal systems and peaceful attempt to resolve the dispute  
                      
Good Morning Esteemed Chief Minister. Again I am writing to you after the appropriate analysis of the facts of Devikulam and Peermedu taluks where the Mullaperiyar dam is located. There are nearly dozen inter-state disputes over the borders within India. But, we all want to put an end to the Mullaperiyar controversy forever. We all know that 90 percent of the population of Peermedu and Devikulam taluks were populated by Tamils right from the beginning. The States Reorganisation Commission member Mr. Panicker used a different yardstick while dealing with Devikulam and Peermedu taluks even though the majority was Tamil population. It was hilarious, a malayalee was appointed to solve an issue between Tamilnadu and Kerala border.   During that time, unfortunately, the ruling Tamilnadu Congress leader Mr. K.Kamaraj who was too generous, he refused to stake his claim to annex the two taluks with Tamilnadu, saying that “they are our people”. Today, the fact is very different. Because, even after the Supreme Court Empowered Committee refers the dam as safe still Kerala wants to demolish it in the name of the territorial rights. Kerala is not an independent country to put territorial rights as own. When the committee had to decide on the border between Utterpradesh and Bihar, Justice Fazal Ali refused himself as he was from one of the states. But when it came to deciding the Kerala border, Mr. Panicker did not follow the principle because he owned plantations in Devikulam and Peermedu area.
Moreover, In the Travancore-Kochin state legislative assembly, Mr. Sharma vehemently argued for the merger of these two taluks with the state of Madras by stating that Tamils constitution more than the majority in the area. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (SB-CID) of Idukki District had sent a report to the ADGP on 17.11.2006 saying that growing Tamil population in Idukki district can be a threat to Kerala’s territorial integrity and that it could lose Devikulam and Peermedu taluks to Tamilnadu and recommended strict measures to control issuance of Voter ID cards and ration cards to Tamils. Consequently, it is only logical and legitimate for the people of Tamilnadu to seek redressal for an injustice committed to them during the reorganization of states by demanding the accession of Peermedu and Devikulam Taluks. In this context, we must listen to the voice of the residents of these two taluks. In that case, if vast majority of the people prefer Tamilnadu, then, Esteemed Chief Minister to file a petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court praying that annexing Devikulam and Peermedu Taluks with Tamilnadu. Most territorial disputes are resolved through bilateral negotiation but previous failed attempts on Mullaperiyar new dam subsequently increase the pressure to undertake further action to settle their particular dispute. Thus, I advocate that peaceful resolution of territorial disputes through legal system.       
Let me conclude it esteemed Chief Minister, from my perspective, this dispute has an economic and strategic importance for Tamilnadu, of course, there is water resources embedded in the territory. By relying on old documents (historically and demographically) and royal decrees as proof of the intention to justify such a demand I am confident that you will take decisive decision to annex the two taluks with Tamilnadu to save our state economy and the interest of the people. 
I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.
         http://www.athinarayananadvisoryauthority.blogspot.com/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r
Post a Comment
Read more

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t
Post a Comment
Read more

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act
Post a Comment
Read more