Skip to main content

MULLAPERIYAR DAM ISSUE - AN IMPECCABLE ANALYSIS


Mullaperiyar Dam Issue – An Impeccable Analysis

         To: The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Tamilnadu Dr. J. Jayalalitha

         From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date: December 10, 2011

RE: Mullaperiyar Issue

Suggestion: WE SHOULD NOT ACCEPT KERALA GOVERNMENT WRONG PROPAGANDA.  

Good Morning Ms. Chief Minister. Again I am writing to you after the appropriate analysis of the facts of Mullaperiyar Dam. The present Dam is at 2800 mts above sea level and the proposed Dam will be at 1800 mts sea level that means it will be 366 m below the centre line of existing Dam.  Practically we won’t get water even if the Kerala government ready to give water to our state because the new Dam that Government of Kerala is proposing is at an altitude 50 feet lesser than the current Dam. The water will come to Tamilnadu only if it is more than 100 feet. When new Dam is constructed with 150 feet height, then also it will be 50 feet lesser than the current level. As a result we won’t get water. In addition, they are trying to put full power on new dam. Kerala government does the wrong propaganda trying to put our state in trouble. Instead they have Idukki Dam 50 kms away from Mullaperiyar Dam which has holding the capacity of 7 times of Mullaperiyar Dam. Kerala government has plan to using the same water from Mullaperiyar to produce power. They are not getting enough water for generating power from Idukki Dam. That is the real fact. If I am not mistaken, what is the capacity of the Mullaperiyar Dam, it is 15 tmc. What is the capacity of the Idukki Dam, it is 70 tmc. If 40 lakhs people will die with 15 tmc dam, then how many will die in 70 tmc Dam? Can you ask them to remove Idukki Dam too?  Because mild damaging earthquake of magnitude 4.5 and intensity VI on the MM scale occurred on June 7, 1988 20 km east of the Idukki reservoir. Why the Government of Kerala is not talking about reservoir induced seismicity caused by Idukki Dam? Why the Government of Kerala never talked about constructing a new Dam in the existing Dam? Why do they want to keep the height of the new Dam lower than the existing Dam? If new Dam is needed then why Supreme Court suggests that we the people of Tamilnadu ready to build new Dam in the same ground with our money. The Government of Kerala needs not to spend their money at all. 

Let me conclude it Ms. Chief Minister, from my perspective, none of the Government of Kerala claims are true or based on evidence. Today I realize that they all ill mind set. Dam is not weak. If the Dam is really weak, the best solution is to construct a new, strong and modern Dam on the exact site of the present Dam and to raise the water to 142 feet as suggested by the Supreme Court of India. I am confident that you will take decisive decision on Mullaperiyar issue to save our state economy and people. 

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act