Skip to main content

US TRADE POLICY WITH CHINA


To:              The United States International Trade Commission Chairman Ms. Deanna 
                   T. Okun 

From:            Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date:            October 31, 2011

RE:               US Trade Policy with China  

Suggestion:  Remove the huge gap between the real and nominal exchange rate, selling American Products is a top priority and not to increase tax on multinational companies in U.S.

Good Morning Chairman. When I tune into BBC world, it reported that U.S. trade policy with China. In my view, tension between China and the United States are usually focused on the core issue of currency. PBOC kept the Yuan quite low for a long period of time while they are accumulating vast hoards of foreign exchange. It is approaching $3 trillion.  China refuses to let its currency appreciate faster even in the face of U.S. pressure because China is export–led growth model. China argued that policy constitutes a de facto subsidy for Chinese export to U.S. and act as a de facto tariff on Chinese imported U.S. goods. The tariffs on Chinese goods would encourage substitution of imports to countries with floating currencies and open capital accounts. This would eventually rebound   towards increased demand for their products which would boost growth and reduce the need for government transfer payments. Thereby it is shrinking the budget deficit. Moreover Chinese goods are cheaper than other products of the same type and Chinese are less likely to buy from abroad. It is not just China, most of the countries including Brazil, India and even others as a mercantilist policy that is all pro exports, restricting imports. Recently officials from the Federal Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and members of congress are all pressing for a big devaluation of against the Yuan to boost U.S. exports. I won’t recommend for an undervalued rate because it will significantly raise the cost of many items everything from energy to consumer goods and cut the real incomes for the households. But U.S. will be avoiding any general rise of the dollar.

The massive U.S. trade deficit with China has become a political and economic issue. In my view, the competitive exchange rate is not sufficient to produce a sustainable trade balance. To be sure, U.S. always have huge gap between the real and nominal exchange rate to promote trade and investment. Indeed, U.S-China bilateral deficit partly reflects an undervaluation of an Yuan and an overvaluation of dollar which cannot be corrected through the exchange rate.

Let me conclude it, the Obama Administration policy goal should be import less from China and selling American products is a top priority at the highest level of the U.S. governments. In addition, Obama Administration should abandon its increases taxes on foreign companies because their investments clearly increase U.S. exports.

Thank you very much for your attention.

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE 2019

To:     The Right Honourable European Commission President Hon. Jean-Claude Juncker   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 19, 2019 RE:      BRITAIN’S BREXIT BATTLE   Suggestion: Hon. European Commission President, let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted repeatedly that backstop must go, if not then no deal BREXIT but he support the GFA and custom-free border between the UK (Northern Ireland) and the EU (Republic of Ireland). That is a blatant contradiction. How can he have it both ways? If the UK wanted to exit from the EU bloc without a deal - the return of a hard border is absolutely necessary. Why BREXITERS are object to the backstop? The reason behind that it would give the EU way to keep a toehold in future UK trade policy. If the UK wanted to leave the EU without backstop, in other words, a hard BREXIT or there is been no exit agreement by both the UK and the EU – then the r

HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019

To:     The Right Honourable Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms. Carrie Lam From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: August 29, 2019 RE:      HONG KONG EXTRADITION BILL 2019 Suggestion: Hon. Chief Executive of the Hong Kong let me start by paying my respects to you and through you to. “One Country Two Systems” structure compels Hong Kong to operate currently under different legal system than that of Mainland China. You published the extradition bill on March 29, 2019 and first reading on April 3, 2019 which will destroy Hong Kong legal independence because extradition bill is another attempt for China to take away the Hong Kong independent legal system that China has agreed for Hong Kong to keep until 2047. Thus, the people of Hong Kong marched their protest against the bill on June 9, 2019. Hong Kong protests are still continuing. The silence of your government leads me to believe you have no plan t

EU NEW FISCAL AUTHORITY FOR WEAK MEMBER STATES

This paper focuses on setting up new fiscal authority to manage compatible fiscal decentralisation and budgetary discipline in the EU Member States. The authority need to adopt a tough fiscal consolidation programme. The authority should be responsible for designing fiscal policy for all Member States with stricter rules, conscientious monitoring and enforcement mechanisms for the conduct of fiscal decentralisation and budgetary policy. If Member States does not implement or violate the fiscal authority law that Member State/States to be sued in the European Court of Justice. We cannot grow our economy without proper fiscal cooperation between Member States. So the fiscal authority must coach at least weak Member States how to implement effective fiscal policy so that crony driven economy can be turned into a competitive market based economy. EU established the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) to avoid excessive deficits of the Member States and take precise act