Skip to main content

MULLAPERIYAR DAM ISSUE - DR JUSTICE A S ANAND FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

                                          Mullaperiyar Dam Issue

To: The Hon’ble Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, Former Chief Justice of India

From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date: Thursday, December 22, 2011

RE: Mullaperiyar dam Issue

Suggestion:   

Good Morning Chief Justice. I, Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja, permanent residing at SAN Nivas, Old No. 28k, New No. 13, Bampalamman Kovil Street, Muhavoor Post, Rajapalayam Taluka, Virdhunagar District, Tamilnadu – 626 111. Today, I would like to take this opportunity to bring to your notice which should be based on reason than on extraneous factors. First, Government of Kerala claim that 22 tremors in last four months. As per the Indian Meteorological Department Data, there have been only four tremors in Idukki district that far away from the Mullaperiyar dam site. Second, the present Mullaperiyar dam is at 2800 mts above sea level and the proposed dam will be at 1800 mts (approximately) sea level that means it will be 366 m below the centre line of existing Dam.  Practically Tamilnadu won’t get water even if the Government of Kerala ready to give water to Tamilnadu state because the new Dam that Government of Kerala is proposing is at an altitude 50 feet lesser than the current dam. The water will come to Tamilnadu only if it is more than 100 feet. When new dam is constructed with 150 feet height, then also it will be 50 feet lesser than the current level. As a result Tamilnadu won’t get water. Kerala government does the wrong propaganda trying to put Tamilnadu state in trouble. Instead they have Idukki Dam 50 kms away from Mullaperiyar Dam which has holding the capacity of 7 times of Mullaperiyar Dam. Kerala government has plan to using the same water from Mullaperiyar to produce power. They are not getting enough water for generating power from Idukki Dam. That is the real fact. Third, “The Hindu” Kochi Edition on Sunday December 11, 2011 reported that  a tremor of intensity two in the Richter Scale in some parts of Idukki district, 35 km away from the Mullaperiyar dam, 11.6 km away from Idukki dam and 5.4 km away from Kulamavu dams. Can you ask the Government of Kerala to remove Idukki Dam too? Why the Government of Kerala is not talking about reservoir induced seismicity caused by Idukki Dam? Why the Government of Kerala never talked about constructing a new Dam in the existing Dam? Why do they want to keep the height of the new Dam lower than the existing Dam? Keralities are famous for orchestrating to make people believe the wrong things like they are doing for “Makara Jyothi”. (Sabarimala’s Makara Jyoti is man-made. Keralities are very expert in it)

The Hon’ble Jutice, it is most humbly prayed that on the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, you are looking into all aspects of safety of the dam. Kerala’s apprehension about the safety of the dam and Tamilnadu’s concern has been a lifeline for lakhs of people in the Southern districts of Tamilnadu. It is my belief that dam is not weak. If the dam is really weak, the best solution is to construct a new, strong and modern dam on the exact site of the present dam by Government of Tamilnadu and to raise the water to 142 feet as suggested by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. I am confident that you can resolve this issue reasonable satisfaction of both sides.   

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect of you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUGGESTION TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, GERMANY

SUGGESTION TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, GERMANY  To:               The Right Honorable Federal Constitutional Court Vice President  From:           Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date:            05.10.2011 RE:               Issuance of Eurobond   Suggestion:    Approval of Issuing Eurobond Good Morning Prof. Dr. Kirchhof. I am writing to express that Federal constitutional court explicitly rules out Eurobonds a few weeks ago. In addition you had warned, Ms. Angela Merkel, a Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, never again to propose Eurobond. This is certainly not good news for me as well as Europe. German brothers and sisters in the Euroland must help in this difficult moment with iss...

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA To: The Right Honorable Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: 30.09.2011 RE: Japan Energy Policy Suggestion: Changing Industrial Policy Good Morning Prime Minister. BBC World broadcasted your speech regarding alternate energy sources. I agree with your approach to reduce nuclear power in the medium term because having the nuclear reactors in an earthquake prone zone is not safe for the environment or the communities that live near them. Japan is struck in a difficult situation concerning energy. If you want to eventually move away from the nuclear energy, you’ll have to invest more alternative energy sources. If you can’t invest, then it may have to say with a nuclear power for a while. You need make the right decision because source of energy is dwindling. You have one more option which is Japanese people depend on nuclear power with only 1% but 9% including hydroe...

SUGGESTION TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR SIR MERVYN KING

SUGGESTION TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR SIR MERVYN KING To:               The Right Honorable Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King   From:           Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date:            October 17, 2011 RE:               QE Suggestion:    Identify and correct the fundamental factors that are behind low economic growth.  Good Morning Sir. The Bank of England has decided to undertake more QE. I agreed that during the financial crisis of 2007-2008 monetary policy was effective in re-establishing liquidity in the main developed economies especially US, UK and Europe. But current economic conditions in developed economies reveal problems whose solutions are far beyond the scope of monetary an...