Skip to main content

US TRADE POLICY WITH CHINA


To:              The United States International Trade Commission Chairman Ms. Deanna 
                   T. Okun 

From:            Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date:            October 31, 2011

RE:               US Trade Policy with China  

Suggestion:  Remove the huge gap between the real and nominal exchange rate, selling American Products is a top priority and not to increase tax on multinational companies in U.S.

Good Morning Chairman. When I tune into BBC world, it reported that U.S. trade policy with China. In my view, tension between China and the United States are usually focused on the core issue of currency. PBOC kept the Yuan quite low for a long period of time while they are accumulating vast hoards of foreign exchange. It is approaching $3 trillion.  China refuses to let its currency appreciate faster even in the face of U.S. pressure because China is export–led growth model. China argued that policy constitutes a de facto subsidy for Chinese export to U.S. and act as a de facto tariff on Chinese imported U.S. goods. The tariffs on Chinese goods would encourage substitution of imports to countries with floating currencies and open capital accounts. This would eventually rebound   towards increased demand for their products which would boost growth and reduce the need for government transfer payments. Thereby it is shrinking the budget deficit. Moreover Chinese goods are cheaper than other products of the same type and Chinese are less likely to buy from abroad. It is not just China, most of the countries including Brazil, India and even others as a mercantilist policy that is all pro exports, restricting imports. Recently officials from the Federal Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and members of congress are all pressing for a big devaluation of against the Yuan to boost U.S. exports. I won’t recommend for an undervalued rate because it will significantly raise the cost of many items everything from energy to consumer goods and cut the real incomes for the households. But U.S. will be avoiding any general rise of the dollar.

The massive U.S. trade deficit with China has become a political and economic issue. In my view, the competitive exchange rate is not sufficient to produce a sustainable trade balance. To be sure, U.S. always have huge gap between the real and nominal exchange rate to promote trade and investment. Indeed, U.S-China bilateral deficit partly reflects an undervaluation of an Yuan and an overvaluation of dollar which cannot be corrected through the exchange rate.

Let me conclude it, the Obama Administration policy goal should be import less from China and selling American products is a top priority at the highest level of the U.S. governments. In addition, Obama Administration should abandon its increases taxes on foreign companies because their investments clearly increase U.S. exports.

Thank you very much for your attention.

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THANK YOU NOTE TO FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA DR A S ANAND

To: The Hon’ble   Dr. Justice A.S. Anand, Former Chief Justice of   India & Empowered Committee Chairman From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 RE: Thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution Bench of Supreme Court Judges.   My lord, please accept my heartfelt thank you and the members of Empowered Committee and the five judge constitution bench of Supreme Court Judges on behalf of myself and all of the people in Tamilnadu for saving lakhs of farmers in the southern districts of Tamilnadu and the fine report you made. I wish you continued success in what you are doing my lord. The completion of the remaining judgement on Mullaperiyar will require Dharma. Every judgement should apply Dharma. Dharma should not be destroyed in any of our judgement. My lord, As you knew that “ according to lease agreement indenture granted full right, power and liberty to the Tamilnadu to construct make...

ISRAEL-IRAN-SYRIA CONFLICTS

To: The Right Honourable Israel Prime Minister Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: May 09, 2018 RE: Israel – Iran – Syria Conflicts Suggestion The Honourable Prime Minister Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, I am writing this letter to you on Israel air strike in Syria yesterday. You are trying to do everything possible to stop Iranian bases in Syria. Do you believe that Iran is building permanent bases inside Syria or close to Israel? How much land has Iran captured or taken from Syria? My answer is none. But you are openly threatened Iran.   Let me put it very clearly to you, there are no winners with war but losers are there. I agreed that you have strongest military force on earth. You could easily arrange a favourable peace treaty with Syria and Iran but you don’t want to negotiate with the Syria and Iran. Israel could not exist as a permanent aggressor without US. It is my humble request you to negotiate peace treaty with Syria and Ir...

Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

To put things into perspective, Nagorno-Karabakh is not an independent entity but an occupied territory of the Azerbaijan Republic and is recognised by the international community and the UN. The fact that the Armenian Prime Minister's son is doing his military service in the Armenian army located in Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh and started an undeclared war against Azerbaijan, occupied Nagorno-Karabakh and 7 adjacent regions of Azerbaijan, and massacred and forcefully deported Azerbaijani aborigines was the main reason for the lack of peace in the region. The laws of armed conflict failed to protect the Nagorno-Karabakh civilian population, individual civilians, and civilian property. The laws of armed conflict failed to discriminate between those taking parts in the fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh. The laws of armed conflict failed to protect the environment as war causes severe or long term damage to the environment. The fact here is that there is a number of international doc...