Skip to main content

US TRADE POLICY WITH CHINA


To:              The United States International Trade Commission Chairman Ms. Deanna 
                   T. Okun 

From:            Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja

Date:            October 31, 2011

RE:               US Trade Policy with China  

Suggestion:  Remove the huge gap between the real and nominal exchange rate, selling American Products is a top priority and not to increase tax on multinational companies in U.S.

Good Morning Chairman. When I tune into BBC world, it reported that U.S. trade policy with China. In my view, tension between China and the United States are usually focused on the core issue of currency. PBOC kept the Yuan quite low for a long period of time while they are accumulating vast hoards of foreign exchange. It is approaching $3 trillion.  China refuses to let its currency appreciate faster even in the face of U.S. pressure because China is export–led growth model. China argued that policy constitutes a de facto subsidy for Chinese export to U.S. and act as a de facto tariff on Chinese imported U.S. goods. The tariffs on Chinese goods would encourage substitution of imports to countries with floating currencies and open capital accounts. This would eventually rebound   towards increased demand for their products which would boost growth and reduce the need for government transfer payments. Thereby it is shrinking the budget deficit. Moreover Chinese goods are cheaper than other products of the same type and Chinese are less likely to buy from abroad. It is not just China, most of the countries including Brazil, India and even others as a mercantilist policy that is all pro exports, restricting imports. Recently officials from the Federal Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and members of congress are all pressing for a big devaluation of against the Yuan to boost U.S. exports. I won’t recommend for an undervalued rate because it will significantly raise the cost of many items everything from energy to consumer goods and cut the real incomes for the households. But U.S. will be avoiding any general rise of the dollar.

The massive U.S. trade deficit with China has become a political and economic issue. In my view, the competitive exchange rate is not sufficient to produce a sustainable trade balance. To be sure, U.S. always have huge gap between the real and nominal exchange rate to promote trade and investment. Indeed, U.S-China bilateral deficit partly reflects an undervaluation of an Yuan and an overvaluation of dollar which cannot be corrected through the exchange rate.

Let me conclude it, the Obama Administration policy goal should be import less from China and selling American products is a top priority at the highest level of the U.S. governments. In addition, Obama Administration should abandon its increases taxes on foreign companies because their investments clearly increase U.S. exports.

Thank you very much for your attention.

I am Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja with great respect.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA

SUGGESTION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF JAPAN YOSHIHIKO NODA To: The Right Honorable Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: 30.09.2011 RE: Japan Energy Policy Suggestion: Changing Industrial Policy Good Morning Prime Minister. BBC World broadcasted your speech regarding alternate energy sources. I agree with your approach to reduce nuclear power in the medium term because having the nuclear reactors in an earthquake prone zone is not safe for the environment or the communities that live near them. Japan is struck in a difficult situation concerning energy. If you want to eventually move away from the nuclear energy, you’ll have to invest more alternative energy sources. If you can’t invest, then it may have to say with a nuclear power for a while. You need make the right decision because source of energy is dwindling. You have one more option which is Japanese people depend on nuclear power with only 1% but 9% including hydroe...

INDIA'S FARM BILL 2020

To:     The Right Hon. Indian Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi   From: Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date: February 15, 2021 RE:     India’s Farm Bills 2020 Suggestion: Hon. Prime Minister, let me start paying my respects to you and through you to. India’s farm reforms have been advocated for many decades by the Indian farm economists. In fact, I’m strongly in the favour of the farm reforms when I was in Indian financial market 2007. The farm laws are very good in intent and end ecologically unsound practices. Farm law needs to be welcomed as farm laws are free market laws which allow private players to directly purchase agriculture products from farmers. In other words, farm law eliminates middlemen and gives the right to farmers to sell their agriculture products to whoever they want and they could decide the price but your government proposal on farm laws which fear that it refrain small farmers have freedom to negotiate to...

SUGGESTION TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR SIR MERVYN KING

SUGGESTION TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR SIR MERVYN KING To:               The Right Honorable Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King   From:           Athinarayanan Sanjeevraja Date:            October 17, 2011 RE:               QE Suggestion:    Identify and correct the fundamental factors that are behind low economic growth.  Good Morning Sir. The Bank of England has decided to undertake more QE. I agreed that during the financial crisis of 2007-2008 monetary policy was effective in re-establishing liquidity in the main developed economies especially US, UK and Europe. But current economic conditions in developed economies reveal problems whose solutions are far beyond the scope of monetary an...